User Tools
foster-marxecol
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
foster-marxecol [2017/12/13 17:20] admin |
foster-marxecol [2017/12/13 17:21] (current) admin |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| {{:foster-mxecol.jpg?150|Marx's Ecology}} | {{:foster-mxecol.jpg?150|Marx's Ecology}} | ||
| - | Paperback, 200 pages | + | Paperback, 200 pages\\ |
| - | [[https://monthlyreview.org/product/marxs_ecology/|Monthly Review Press]], 2000 | + | [[https://monthlyreview.org/product/marxs_ecology/|Monthly Review Press]], 2000\\ |
| - | ISDN: 9781583670125 | + | ISBN: 9781583670125 |
| Marx, it is often assumed, cared only about industrial growth and the development of economic forces. John Bellamy Foster examines Marx’s neglected writings on capitalist agriculture and soil ecology, philosophical naturalism, and evolutionary theory. He shows that Marx, known as a powerful critic of capitalist society, was also deeply concerned with the changing human relationship to nature. //Marx’s Ecology// covers many other thinkers, including Epicurus, Charles Darwin, Thomas Malthus, Ludwig Feuerbach, P. J. Proudhon, and William Paley. By reconstructing a materialist conception of nature and society, Marx’s Ecology challenges the spiritualism prevalent in the modern Green movement, pointing toward a method that offers more lasting and sustainable solutions to the ecological crisis. | Marx, it is often assumed, cared only about industrial growth and the development of economic forces. John Bellamy Foster examines Marx’s neglected writings on capitalist agriculture and soil ecology, philosophical naturalism, and evolutionary theory. He shows that Marx, known as a powerful critic of capitalist society, was also deeply concerned with the changing human relationship to nature. //Marx’s Ecology// covers many other thinkers, including Epicurus, Charles Darwin, Thomas Malthus, Ludwig Feuerbach, P. J. Proudhon, and William Paley. By reconstructing a materialist conception of nature and society, Marx’s Ecology challenges the spiritualism prevalent in the modern Green movement, pointing toward a method that offers more lasting and sustainable solutions to the ecological crisis. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| The Crisis of Socio-Ecology | The Crisis of Socio-Ecology | ||
| - | 1. The Materialist Conception of Nature | + | 1. The Materialist Conception of Nature\\ |
| Materialism and the Very Early Marx\\ | Materialism and the Very Early Marx\\ | ||
| - | Epicurus and the Revolution of Science and Reason\\ | + | Epicurus and the Revolution of Science and Reason |
| - | 2. The Really Earthly Question | + | |
| - | Feuerbach | + | 2. The Really Earthly Question\\ |
| + | Feuerbach\\ | ||
| The Alienation of Nature and Humanity\\ | The Alienation of Nature and Humanity\\ | ||
| - | Association versus Political Economy\\ | + | Association versus Political Economy |
| - | 3. Parson Naturalists | + | |
| + | 3. Parson Naturalists\\ | ||
| Natural Theology\\ | Natural Theology\\ | ||
| Natural Theology and Political Economy\\ | Natural Theology and Political Economy\\ | ||
| Line 57: | Line 56: | ||
| A Young Darwinian and Karl Marx\\ | A Young Darwinian and Karl Marx\\ | ||
| - | 7/ Epilogue\\ | + | 7. Epilogue\\ |
| Dialectical Naturalism\\ | Dialectical Naturalism\\ | ||
| Marxism and Ecology after Engels\\ | Marxism and Ecology after Engels\\ | ||
foster-marxecol.1513203628.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/12/13 17:20 by admin
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
